Applied Nursing Research
Volume 16, Issue 1 , Pages 2-8, February 2003

Differentiating quality improvement from research☆

Anita C. Reinhardt, MSN, RN, Doctoral Student, School of Nursing at Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Leslie N. Ray, PhD, RN, Assistant Professor, School of Nursing, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR

Abstract 

Monitoring of quality of care has always been an important part of health care. Self-regulation and external standards require care providers to furnish safe environments for the patient. Similarities in methods used by quality improvement (QI) projects and clinical research have created some confusion in differentiating the two practices. This article reviews the current literature and differences between QI and research. In addition, the article identifies and discusses four criteria: intervention, risk, audience, and data source, which allow investigators to differentiate between the two practices and follow the appropriate procedures for project review. Copyright 2003, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

 

☆ Address reprint requests to Anita C. Reinhardt, MSN, RN, 8044 Ellison Loop NW, Olympia, WA 98502.

PII: S0897-1897(02)10903-7

doi:10.1053/apnr.2003.59000

Applied Nursing Research
Volume 16, Issue 1 , Pages 2-8, February 2003

Article Tools