Applied Nursing Research
Volume 16, Issue 1 , Pages 46-52, February 2003

Overcoming subject recruitment challenges: Strategies for successful collaboration with novice research agencies☆☆☆

Patricia Butterfield, PhD, RN, Professor, College of Nursing, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT; Shawna M. Yates, MS, Western University of Health Sciences, College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific, Pomona, CA; Bonnie Rogers, DrPH, RN, FAAN, Director, Occupational Health Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Julia M. Healow, BS, Research Associate, College of Nursing, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT

Article Outline

Abstract 

In most studies, the investigator reaches out to locate potential research subjects using direct strategies such as targeted radio advertising, recruitment posters, and newspaper advertisements). However, other studies may depend on indirect methods of locating potential subjects and work through intermediary contacts in clinics and hospital outpatient departments. Some agency personnel may not have had prior experience with clinical research protocols and may be unfamiliar with screening potential subjects; these personnel are likely to be employed in agencies unaffiliated with academic health sciences centers. In cases in which agency staff members are new to clinical research, special attention is required to keep agency personnel updated about the status of the research and subject recruitment efforts. This article provides an overview of practical tips designed to engage and sustain the interest of novice research agencies in subject recruitment. The article concludes with a case overview of recruitment issues that occurred during a clinical trial addressing occupational low back pain. Copyright 2003, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

 

Back to Article Outline

References 

  1. Bach CA, McDaniel RW. Techniques for conducting research with quadriplegic adults residing in the community. Qualitative Health Research. 1995;5(2):250–255
  2. Berman BA, Grosser SC, Gritz ER. Recruitment to a school-based adult smoking-cessation program: Do gender and race/ethnicity make a difference?. Journal of Cancer Education. 1998;13(4):220–225
  3. Butterfield PG, Spencer PS, Yates S. Back-pain related absenteeism: Differences between small and large companies. Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health. 1999;5(2):215–225
  4. Butterfield PG, Spencer PS, Redmond N, Feldstein A, Perrin N. Low back pain: Predictors of absenteeism, residual symptoms, functional impairment, and medical costs in Oregon workers' compensation recipients. American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 1998;34:559–567
  5. Côté-Arsenault D, Morrison-Beedy D. Practical advice for planning and conducting focus groups. Nursing Research. 1999;48(5):280–283
  6. Eaves YD. Family recruitment issues and strategies: Caregiving in rural African Americans. Nursing Research. 1999;48(3):183–187
  7. Evans ME, Mejía-Maya LJ, Zayas LH, Boothroyd RA, Rodriquez O. Conducting research in culturally-diverse inner-city neighborhoods: Some lessons learned. Journal of Transcultural Nursing. 2001;12(1):6–14
  8. Glasgow NJ, Murdoch JC, Baynouna L, Al Sabosy MMA, Al Jabiri ONK, Harron DWG. Doing randomized controlled trials in a developing country: Some practical realities. Family Practice. 1996;13(1):98–103
  9. Hodge FS, Weinmann S, Roubideaux Y. Recruitment of American Indians and Alaska Natives into clinical trials. Annals of Epidemiology. 2000;10(suppl):S41–S48
  10. Leader MA, Neuwirth E. Clinical research and the noninstitutional elderly: A model for subject recruitment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 1978;26(1):27–31
  11. Shreffler MJ. Culturally sensitive research methods of surveying rural/frontier residents. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 1999;21(3):426–435
  12. Urich U, Browning M, Gaffney EV, Schoter KH, Chesnut CH. Implementation of an osteoporosis research program with a mobile dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry unit: The Montana/Wyoming experience. Osteoporosis International. 1997;7(6):583–588
  13. Wagner DI. Health promotion cooperatives: An alternative delivery system for rural health promotion programs. Journal of Health Education. 1994;25(2):77–81
  14. Walson PD. Patient recruitment: U.S. perspective. Pediatrics. 1999;104(3):619–622

☆ Supported by the National Institute of Nursing Research (Project #R29 NR04450-05) and the Center for Research on Occupational and Environmental Toxicology at Oregon Health & Science University.

☆☆ Address reprint requests to Patricia G. Butterfield, PhD, RN, College of Nursing, 207 Sherrick Hall, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717.

PII: S0897-1897(02)10907-4

doi:10.1053/apnr.2003.50004

Applied Nursing Research
Volume 16, Issue 1 , Pages 46-52, February 2003

Article Tools