Could lack of clarity in written advance directives contribute to their ineffectiveness? A study of the content of written advance directives☆
Article Outline
Abstract
Since 1991, advance directives have failed to have a significant impact on end of life care. One reason is that despite widespread interest in these documents, few individuals have chosen to issue advance directives. Another reason reported in several studies is that the conditions under which the patient intended the directives to apply are unclear as are some of the treatments requested or declined. The purpose of this study was to describe instructions commonly included in written advance directives concerning the conditions under which the directives should apply and the treatments that are requested or declined. Five hundred consecutive closed medical records were reviewed from the medical and surgical departments of an urban hospital. These records produced 40 (8%) advance directive documents. Patient instructions indicating when the directives should take effect and which treatments should be declined or provided were summarized. Nurses and other health professionals can use this information to assist in patients in making their advance directives as clear as possible and to make patients more aware of the potential limitations of these types of written instructions. Copyright 2003, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.
No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.
References
- . Advance directives as acts of communication: A randomized controlled trial. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2001;161:421–430 487-488
- . Dehydration and the dying patient. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 1995;10:192–197
- . When to treat dehydration in a terminally ill patient?. Support Care Cancer. 1997;5:205–211
- . Use of advance directives: A survey in three clinics. Wisconsin Medical Journal. 1995;94:239–243
- . The use of living wills at the end of life. A national study. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1996;13:1018–1022
- . Nursing knowledge for the 21st century: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 2000;32:117–123
- . Failure of advance care planning to elicit patients' preferences for withdrawal from dialysis. American Journal of Kidney Disease. 1999;33:688–693
- . Advance directives in the medical intensive care unit of a community teaching hospital. Chest. 1995;107:752–756
- . Patients' attitudes towards advance directives and end of life treatment decisions. Nursing Outlook. 1997;45:204–208
- . Pub. L. No. 101-508, Paragraph 4206, 4751 1990;
- . Advance directives: the emerging body of research. American Journal of Critical Care. 1999;8:514–519
- . Advance care planning: pitfalls, progress, promise. Critical Care Medicine. 2001;29:N34–N39
- . Methods of hydration in palliative care patients. Journal of Palliative Care. 1998;14:6–13
- . A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1995;274:1591–1598
- . Do advance directives provide instructions that direct care? SUPPORT investigators study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatment. Journal of American Geriatrics Society. 1997;45:508–512
- . Role of written advance directives in decision making: insights from qualitative and quantitative data. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 1998;13:439–446
- . Terminal nutrition: framing the debate for the withdrawal of nutritional support in terminally ill patients. American Journal of Medicine. 2000;109:740–741
☆ Address reprint requests to Marie T. Nolan, DNSc, RN, 11104 Montgomery Road, Beltsville, MD 20705. E-mail: mnolan@son.jhmi.edu.
PII: S0897-1897(03)00003-X
doi:10.1053/apnr.2003.50007
© 2003 Published by Elsevier Inc.
