« Previous
Next »
Applied Nursing Research
Volume 18, Issue 2
, Pages 72-73
, May 2005
Commentary on “Shared Decision Making and Nursing Informatics Research in Norway”
References
- . The internet as a catalyst for shifting power in provider–patient relationships. Nursing Outlook. 2002;50:195–203
- . Internet health resources. Pew Internet & American Life Project [online]. Retrieved November 7, 2004 from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Health_Report_July_2003.pdf2003;
- . Vital decisions: How internet users decide what information to trust when they or their loved ones are sick. Pew Internet & American Life Project [online]. Retrieved November 7, 2004 from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Vital_Decisions_May2002.pdf2002;
- . Promoting partnerships: Challenges for the internet age. British Medical Journal. 1999;319:761–764
- . Consumer informatics supporting patients as co-producers of quality. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2001;8:309–316
- . Framing effects on expectations, decisions, and side effects experienced: The case of the influenza immunization. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1996;49:1271–1276
- . Patient decision-making behavior: An emerging paradigm for nursing science. Nursing Research. 2001;50:267–274
- . Understanding patients' decisions: Cognitive and emotional perspectives. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1993;270:72–76
- In: Shortliffe EH, Perreault LE, Wiederhold G, Fagan LM editor. Medical informatics. 2nd ed.. New York: Springer; 2000;
- In: Smedley BD, Stith AY, Nelson AR editor. Unequal treatment: What healthcare providers need to know about racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2003;
PII: S0897-1897(05)00027-3
doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2005.03.001
« Previous
Next »
Applied Nursing Research
Volume 18, Issue 2
, Pages 72-73
, May 2005
