Applied Nursing Research
Volume 19, Issue 3 , Pages 134-143 , August 2006

The effects of home monitoring by public health nurse on individuals' diabetes control

  • Yeter Kıtış, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Gazi Üniversitesi Hemþirelik Yüksekokulu, 06330 Ankara, Turkey
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding authors. Yeter Kıtış is to be contacted at Tel.: +90 312 202 3367; fax: +90 312 2225936. Oya Nuran Emiroğlu, Tel.: +90 3051580/141; fax: +90 312 3127085.
    • ,
  • Oya Nuran Emıroğlu

      Affiliations

    • Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu, 06100 Ankara, Turkey
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding authors. Yeter Kıtış is to be contacted at Tel.: +90 312 202 3367; fax: +90 312 2225936. Oya Nuran Emiroğlu, Tel.: +90 3051580/141; fax: +90 312 3127085.

Received 15 July 2004 ,Accepted 15 July 2005.

References 

  1. Alberti KGMM. Treating type 2 diabetes—Today's targets, tomorrow's goals. Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism. 2001;3(Suppl. 1):3–10
  2. Burns N, Grove SK. Quasi-experimental research. The practice of nursing research conduct, critique and utilisation. 4th ed.. Philadelphia: W.B. Sounders Company; 2001;
  3. Cabrera-Pivaral CE, Gozalez-Perez G, Vega-Lopez G, Gonzalez-Hita M, Centeno-Lopez M, Gonzalez-Ortiz M, et al. Effects of behavior-modifying education in the metabolic profile of the type 2 diabetes mellitus patient. Journal of Diabetes and Its Complications. 2000;14:322–326
  4. Campbell L, Rössner S. Management of obesity in patient with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Medicine. 2001;18:345–454
  5. Cryer PE. Hypoglycaemia is the limiting factor in the management of diabetes. Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews. 1999;15:42–46
  6. Ellis SE, et al. Diabetes patient education: A meta-analysis and meta-regression. Patient education and counseling. 2003;Retrieved October 14, 2004 from www.elsevier.com/locate/pateducou
  7. Fritsche A, Stumvoll M, Goebbel S, Reinaur KM, Schmulling RM, Haring HU. Long term effect of a structured in patient teaching and treatment programme in type 2 diabetic patients: Influence of mode of follow-up. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. 1999;46:135–141
  8. Garcia R, Suarez R. Diabetes education in the elderly: A 5 year follow-up of an interactive approach. Patient Education and Counseling. 1996;29:87–97
  9. Garvey TW. Metabolic disorders, diabetes mellitus in adults. Section 7. In:  Rakel RE editors. Rakel 2000 Conn's current therapy. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 2000;p. 549–576
  10. Geffrey D. Home based management can achieve intensification cost effectively in type 1 diabetes. Paediatrics. 1999;103(1):122–128
  11. Gumbiner B. The treatment of obesity in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Primary Care. 1999;26(4):56–62
  12. Internatıonal Diabetes Federation . Internatıonal consensus standards of practice for diabetes education. Salisbury (UK): Baskerville Press; 1997;
  13. In:  İmamoğlu Ş,  Akalın S,  Yılmaz MT editor. Diabetes and you. Health Ministry National Diabetes Program Study Group. İstanbul: Tasarım Escort Press; 1999;
  14. King P, Peacock I, Donnelly R. The UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS): Clinical and therapeutic implications for type 2 diabetes. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 1999;48:643–648
  15. Lefebvre PJ, Scheen AJ. State of current therapy and patient care in Europe. International Journal of Clinical Practice. 1999;(Suppl 107):6–10
  16. Mensing C, Boucher J, Cypress M. National standards for diabetes self-management education. Diabetes Care. 2000;23(5):682–686
  17. McDonald PE. Nursing perception: Issues that arise in caring for patients with diabetes. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1999;30(20):4235–4243
  18. Özer E. Diet handbook for diabetics. Istanbul: Özden Press; 2000;
  19. Piette JD, Weinberger M, McPhee S. The effect of automated calls with telephone nurse follow-up on patient centred outcomes of diabetes care. Medical Care. 2000;38(2):218–230
  20. Polit DF, Hungler BP. Nursing research principles and methods. 6th ed.. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1999;
  21. Prime Ministry of Turkish Republic, State Institute of Statistics . In: Death statistics for province and township centers, 1998. Ankara: DİE Press; 2001;p. 66–69
  22. Rost KM, Flavin KS, Hc Gill JB. Change in metabolic control and functional status after hospitalization. Diabetes Care. 1999;14(14):881–889
  23. Standel E. Cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism. 1999;1(Suppl. 2):524–536
  24. Sübüloğlu K, Sümbüloğlu V. Biostatistics. Ankara: Hatipoğlu Press; 2000;
  25. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: (UKPDS 38). British Medical Journal. 1998;317:703–713
  26. Warren-Boulton E, Greenberg R, Lising R, Gallivan M. An update on primary care management of type 2 diabetes. The Nurse Practitioner. 1999;24(12):14–33
  27. Veneman TF, Erkelens DW. Hypoglycaemia unawareness in noninsulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 1997;82(6):1682–1683
  28. Wheeler ML. Nutrition management and physical activity as treatments for diabetes. Primary Care. 1999;26(4):857–868
  29. Williams G. Obesity and type 2 diabetes: A conflict of interest?. International Journal of Obesity. 1999;23(Suppl. 7):2–4
  30. Yılmaz T. A global health problem: Diabetes mellitus. Hemşirelik Forumu. 1999;2(2):73
  31. In:  Yılmaz C,  Yılmaz T,  İmamoğlu Ş editor. Diabetes mellitus 2000. İstanbul: Gri Tasarım Publishing; 2000;p. 22–45

☆ This research is a PhD thesis in public health nursing. It has not been published in any publication.

PII: S0897-1897(06)00045-0

doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2005.07.007

Applied Nursing Research
Volume 19, Issue 3 , Pages 134-143 , August 2006

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution