Applied Nursing Research
Volume 19, Issue 3 , Pages 156-162, August 2006

The reliability of two observation methods of nonblanchable erythema, Grade 1 pressure ulcer

  • Katrien Vanderwee, MA, RN

      Affiliations

    • Nursing Science, Ghent University, B-9000 Gent, Belgium
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +32 9 240 36 29; fax: +32 9 240 50 02.
  • ,
  • Maria H.F. Grypdonck, PhD, RN

      Affiliations

    • Nursing Science, Ghent University, B-9000 Gent, Belgium
  • ,
  • Dirk De Bacquer, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Epidemiology and Statistics, Ghent University, B-9000 Gent, Belgium
  • ,
  • Tom Defloor, PhD, RN

      Affiliations

    • Nursing Science, Ghent University, B-9000 Gent, Belgium

Received 1 March 2005; accepted 16 June 2005.

Abstract 

Accurate identification of nonblanchable erythema (NBE) is essential in pressure ulcer prevention. This descriptive study assessed interrater reliability between a researcher and trained nurses in observing blanchable erythema and NBE and examined the predictive validity and level of agreement between two observation methods for NBE. Findings suggest that the transparent disk method should be preferred to the finger method. The interrater reliability between the researcher and the nurses was substantial and was higher for the observations at the sacrum than for those at the heels. Educational level and years of nursing experience did not seem to influence interrater reliability.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 12.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0897-1897(06)00050-4

doi:10.1016/j.apnr.2005.06.005

Applied Nursing Research
Volume 19, Issue 3 , Pages 156-162, August 2006