Applied Nursing Research
Volume 21, Issue 2 , Pages 104-109 , May 2008

Pain measurement during labor: comparing the visual analog scale with dermatome assessment

  • Chris Winkelman, RN, PhD, ACNP, CCRN

      Affiliations

    • Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 216 368 0700.
  • ,
  • David Norman, CRNA, DNP

      Affiliations

    • Naval Hospital Twentynine, Palms, CA, USA
  • ,
  • Judith A. Maloni, PhD, RN, FAAN

      Affiliations

    • Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
  • ,
  • Jack R. Kless, CRNA, MSN

      Affiliations

    • Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA

Received 2 March 2006 ,Revised 22 May 2006 ,Accepted 30 May 2006.

References 

  1. AHRQ . Management of cancer symptoms. Retrieved January 16, 2006, from http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/epcsums/csympsum.htm2003;
  2. Akinpelu AO, Olowe OO. Correlative study of 3 pain rating scales among obstetric patients. African Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences. 2002;3(2):123–126
  3. Berthier F, Potel G, Leconte P, Touze MD, Baron D. Comparative study of methods of measuring acute pain intensity in the ED. American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 1998;16(2):132–136
  4. Bird SB, Dickson EW. Clinically significant changes in pain along the visual analog scale. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2001;38(6):672–674
  5. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Statistical Methods in Medical Research. 1999;8(2):135–160
  6. Bodian CA, Freedman G, Hossain S, Eisenkraft JB, Beilin Y. The visual analog scale for pain: Clinical significance in postoperative patients. Anesthesiology. 2001;95(6):1356–1361
  7. Breivik EK, Bjornsson GA, Skovlund E. A comparison of pain rating scales by sampling from clinical trial data. Clinical Journal of Pain. 2001;17(1):104–105
  8. Bricker L, Lavendre T. Parenteral opioids for labor pain relief: A systematic review. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2002;186(Suppl. 5):S94–S109
  9. Caton D, Corry MP, Frigoloetto FD, Hopkins DP, Lieberman R, Mayberry L, et al. The nature and management of labor pain: Executive summary. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2002;186(Suppl. 5):S1–S15
  10. Chatburn RL. Evaluation of instrument error and method agreement. American Association of Nurse Anesthetists Journal. 1996;64(3):261–268
  11. Cherng CH, Yang CP, Wong CS. Epidural fentanyl speeds the onset of sensory and motor blocks during epidural ropivacaine anesthesia. Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2005;101(6):1834–1837
  12. Flaherty SA. Pain measurement tools for clinical practice and research. American Association of Nurse Anesthetists Journal. 1996;64(2):133–140
  13. Gagliese L, Weizblit N, Ellis W, Chan VW. The measurement of postoperative pain: A comparison in younger and older surgical patients. Pain. 2005;117(3):412–420
  14. Good M, Stiller C, Zauszniewski JA, Anderson GC, Stanton-Hicks M, Grass JA. Sensation and distress of pain scales: Reliability, validity and sensitivity. Journal of Nursing Measurement. 2001;9(3):219–238
  15. Hausman KA. Assessment of the nervous system. In:  Ignatavicius DD,  Workman L editor. Medical–surgical nursing: Critical thinking for collaborative care. 5th ed.. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2005;p. 922–945
  16. Hirabayashi S, Kumano K, Ohnishi I, Hosino Y, Nakamura K, Kurokawa T. Relationship between the anatomic and dermatomal level of spinal cord tumors in the thoracic region. Journal of Spinal Disorders. 1995;8(2):93–102
  17. Huthchison WD, Davis KD, Lozano AM, Tasker RR, Dostrovsky JO. Pain related neurons in the human anterior cingulate cortex. Nature Neuroscience. 1999;2(5):403–405
  18. IASP . IASP pain terminology. Retrieved January 16, 2006, from http://www.iasp-pain.org/terms-p.htm1994; 2005;
  19. ICSI . Assessment and management of acute pain: 2. Retrieved January 16, 2006, from www.guidelines.gov/summary/summary.aspx?ss=15&doc_id=4930&nbr=35172004;
  20. Kelly AM. Does the clinically significant difference in visual analog scale pain scores vary with age, gender or causes of pain?. Emergency Medicine. 2001;13(1):57–60
  21. Leeman L, Fontaine P, King V, Klein MC, Ratcliffe S. The nature and management of labor pain: Part I. Nonpharmacologic pain relief. American Family Physician. 2003;68(6):1109–1112
  22. Lowe NK. The nature and management of labor pain: Peer-reviewed papers from an evidence-based symposium. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2002;186(5):S16–S24
  23. Martinez-Arizala A. Methods to measure sensory function in humans versus animals. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. 2003;40(4):35–40
  24. McCool WF, Smith T, Aberg C. Pain in women's health: A multifaceted approach toward understanding. Journal of Nurse Midwifery and Women's Health. 2004;49(6):473–481
  25. Morgan GE, Mikhail MS, Murray MJ. Clinical anesthesiology. 4th ed.. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2006;
  26. Myles PS, Urquhart N. The linearity of the visual analogue scale in patients with severe acute pain. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. 2005;33(5):686–687
  27. Norman, D., Winkelman, C., Hanrahan, E., Hood, R., & Nance, B. (in press). Labor epidurals comparing loss of resistance with air versus saline: Does the choice matter? American Association of Nurse Anesthetists Journal.
  28. Reese CA. Clinical techniques of regional anesthesia. 2nd ed.. Park Ridge, IL: American Association of Nurse Anesthetists; 1996;
  29. Schoonjans F. MedCalc. Retrieved January 31, 2006, from http://www.medcalc.be/index.php2006; October 2005;
  30. Sheiner E, Sheiner FK, Hershkovitz R, Mazor M, Datz M, Shoham-Vardi I. Overestimation and underestimation of labor pain. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2000;91(1):37–49
  31. Simkin PP, O'Hara M. Nonpharmacologic relief of pain during labor: Systematic reviews of five methods. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2002;186(Suppl. 5):S131–S159

PII: S0897-1897(06)00057-7

doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2006.05.002

Applied Nursing Research
Volume 21, Issue 2 , Pages 104-109 , May 2008