Applied Nursing Research
Volume 21, Issue 3 , Pages 165-168, August 2008

Developing a codebook to guide content analysis of expressive writing transcripts

  • Marsha E. Fonteyn, PhD, RN, OCN

      Affiliations

    • Phyllis F. Cantor Center, Dana–Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115-6084, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 617 632 5639 (office); fax: +1 617 632 5636.
  • ,
  • Margaret Vettese, PhD, RN

      Affiliations

    • Phyllis F. Cantor Center, Dana–Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115-6084, USA
  • ,
  • Diane R. Lancaster, PhD, RN

      Affiliations

    • Nursing Department, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
  • ,
  • Susan Bauer-Wu, DNSc, RN

      Affiliations

    • Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA

Received 20 June 2006; accepted 28 August 2006.

Abstract 

This article describes a team-based approach to the development of a comprehensive codebook for multiple researchers to use during content analysis of the transcripts of the expressive writings of women (in this study, N = 89) with metastatic breast cancer. The codebook structure was developed iteratively by reaching a consensus on the analysis of shared transcripts to create an all-encompassing set of codes, with definitions, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and exemplar text from the transcripts. The Qualitative Solutions and Research International NVivo software program was used to maintain an electronic database of the consensus analysis of transcripts, information about each code, and a detailed log about the process of developing the codebook. The team ultimately created a comprehensive codebook that contained 27 codes with definitions, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and example text. The codes were verified by each team member through reanalysis of a set of shared transcripts that had been previously coded using an earlier version of the codebook. The team met to discuss individual coding and reached a consensus on the final version of the codebook. No new code was identified during the reanalysis, and there was fairly uniform agreement on the coding. The final version of the codebook will be used to guide each team member's individual analysis of the remaining (74) transcripts, which will be divided among the team. Periodic meetings are planned to discuss the individual analysis and to resolve any issue associated with using the codebook. As new codes are identified and agreed upon by the team, they will be added to the codebook. A team-based approach can facilitate the development of a practical and accurate codebook to guide the analysis of a large amount of qualitative data.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 12.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0897-1897(06)00099-1

doi:10.1016/j.apnr.2006.08.005

Applied Nursing Research
Volume 21, Issue 3 , Pages 165-168, August 2008