Advertisement
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 11-21 (February 2010)


View previous. 5 of 12 View next.

Error identification and recovery by student nurses using human patient simulation: Opportunity to improve patient safety

Elizabeth A. Henneman, RN, PhD, CCNSaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Joan P. Roche, RN, PhD, APRNaemail address, Donald L. Fisher, PhDbemail address, Helene Cunningham, RN, MSaemail address, Cheryl A. Reilly, RN, PhDaemail address, Brian H. Nathanson, PhDcemail address, Philip L. Henneman, MDdemail address

Received 8 October 2007; received in revised form 19 January 2008; accepted 19 February 2008. published online 16 January 2009.

Abstract 

This study examined types of errors that occurred or were recovered in a simulated environment by student nurses. Errors occurred in all four rule-based error categories, and all students committed at least one error. The most frequent errors occurred in the verification category. Another common error was related to physician interactions. The least common errors were related to coordinating information with the patient and family. Our finding that 100% of student subjects committed rule-based errors is cause for concern. To decrease errors and improve safe clinical practice, nurse educators must identify effective strategies that students can use to improve patient surveillance.

a School of Nursing, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA

b College of Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA

c OptiStatim, LLC, Longmeadow, MA 01106, USA

d Department of Emergency Medicine, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, MA, USA

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 413 545 0405.

PII: S0897-1897(08)00009-8

doi:10.1016/j.apnr.2008.02.004


View previous. 5 of 12 View next.

Advertisement