Applied Nursing Research
Volume 23, Issue 3 , Pages 159-163, August 2010

Comparison of agreement between different measures of blood pressure in normotensive females

Ege University, School of Nursing, 35100 Bornova, İzmir, Turkey

Received 20 June 2007; received in revised form 30 June 2008; accepted 14 July 2008. published online 16 January 2009.

Abstract 

The aim of this study was to determine whether there are differences between nurse-taken blood pressure (BP), physician-taken BP, and automated device. BP was measured in 163 normotensive females. In a center for family planning and mother–child health, measurements were taken by a male physician and by a nurse and by using a validated automatic device. The difference between the systolic and diastolic BP recordings at the three measurement modalities was statistically significant (p < .001). BPs taken by the physician were markedly higher than the measurements taken by the nurse and the automated device. The results from this study show that systolic and diastolic BP taken using an automated device in normotensive females are significantly lower than the readings obtained by the physician and are almost identical to those taken by the nurse. Physicians should therefore not make any decisions based on BP measured manually during a first encounter and should rely on BP reported by well-trained observers or by validated automatic devices.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 12.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0897-1897(08)00078-5

doi:10.1016/j.apnr.2008.07.002

Applied Nursing Research
Volume 23, Issue 3 , Pages 159-163, August 2010