Validation and testing of the Acceptability E-scale for Web-based patient-reported outcomes in cancer care

References 

1. Basch E, Artz D, Dulko D, Scher K, Sabbatini P, Hensley M, et al. Patient online self-reporting of toxicity symptoms during chemotherapy. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2005;23(15):3552–3561
2. Basch E, Artz D, Iasonos A, Speakman J, Shannon K, Lin K, et al. Evaluation of an online platform for cancer patient self-reporting of chemotherapy toxicities. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2007;14(3):264–268
3. Berry DL, Trigg LJ, Lober WB, Karras BT, Galligan ML, Austin-Seymour M, et al. Computerized symptom and quality-of-life assessment for patients with cancer part i: Development and pilot testing. Oncology Nursing Forum. 2004;31(5):E75–E83
4. Bush N, Donaldson G, Moinpour C, Haberman M, Milliken D, Markle V, et al. Development, feasibility and compliance of a Web-based system for very frequent qol and symptom home self-assessment after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Quality of Life Research. 2005;14(1):77–93
5. Carlson LE, Speca M, Hagen N, Taenzer P. Computerized quality-of-life screening in a cancer pain clinic. Journal of Palliative Care. 2001;17(1):46–52
   • MEDLINE
6. Chernecky C, Macklin D, Walter J. Internet design preferences of patients with cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum. 2006;33(4):787–792
7. Cunningham L, Weber Z, Cook K. Infinite excellence. Live the brand promise by emphasizing “always”. Marketing Health Services. 2007;27(2):12–19
8. DeVellis RF. In: Scale development: Theory and applications. 2nd ed.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc; 2003;p. 67
9. Dockrey MR, Lober WB, Berry D, Wolpin S, Rae LJ. Distributed health assessment and intervention research software framework. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings. 2005;940:
10. Elder JS. Assessing patient satisfaction—the government has a solution. Journal of Urology. 2007;177(4):1223
11. Gysels M, Higginson IJ. Interactive technologies and videotapes for patient education in cancer care: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2007;15(1):7–20
12. Karras BT, Wolpin S, Lober WB, Bush N, Fann JR, Berry DL. Electronic self-report assessment–cancer (esra-c): Working towards an integrated survey system. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. 2006;122:514–518
    • MEDLINE
13. Middeke M, Bauhofer A, Kopp I, Koller M. Computerized visualization of quality of life data of individual cancer patients–the qol-profiler. Inflammation Research, 53 Suppl 2. 2004;S175–S178
14. Mullen KH, Berry DL, Zierler BK. Computerized symptom and quality-of-life assessment for patients with cancer part ii: Acceptability and usability. Oncology Nursing Forum. 2004;31(5):E84–E89
15. Netemeyer RG, Bearden WO, Sharma S. Reliability. In: Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. 1st ed.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc; 2003;p. 41–70
16. Taenzer PA, Speca M, Atkinson MJ, Bultz BD, Page S, Harasym P, et al. Computerized quality-of-life screening in an oncology clinic. Cancer Practice. 1997;5(3):168–175
    • MEDLINE
17. van den Brink JL, Moorman PW, de Boer MF, Pruyn JF, Verwoerd CD, van Bemmel JH. Involving the patient: A prospective study on use, appreciation and effectiveness of an information system in head and neck cancer care. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2005;74(10):839–849
    • Abstract
    • Full Text
    • Full-Text PDF (382 KB)
    • CrossRef
18. Wolpin S, Berry D, Austin-Seymour M, Bush N, Fann JR, Halpenny B, et al. Acceptability of an electronic self report assessment program for patients with cancer. Computers, Informatics, Nursing. 2008;26(6):332–338